Skip to content
 

Ary's Inspiration Sharing

Success Mindset & Business Motivation To Value Your Life

  • Home

support

Pandela Review

28 Jan 2010 ary

Web hosting companies are rapidly opening up as older and more popular providers are experiencing troubles due to insufficient number of fast servers that could give full service to so many customers. While these companies still stay competitive, they are not progressing without some criticism coming from unsatisfied customers and other web hosting providers are trying to take advantage of that including Pandela which falls in the category of Virtual Private Server solutions. These types of solutions effectively eliminate the frustration by using he power of virtualization to make the servers more functional, secure, and, most of all, more affordable. Pandela aims to offer as many plans as possible to attract all kinds of customers.

About Pandela Hosting

Pandela is a company that has been in the IT industry for more than 20 years with its value recognized in 2008 when it was bought by UltraHosting, Inc. which is one of the leading providers of dedicated and collocation services. They have servers in Los   Angeles, CA, Dallas  TX, and Toronto,  Canada.

Pros

The great advantage of Pandela over other VPS services is the long time they have spent in the IT market visibly resulting in the innovation they are bringing to the customers. Pandela offers a special web hosting control panel called NextGen. Using Flash and XML technologies, the performance is surprisingly fast and allows for an easy control of all aspects of the host. It is possible to do common tasks such as setting up FTPs or e-mail accounts in not more than 3 clicks. There are also some tools that are not often to be found in control panels including hotlink protection, IP blocking, and custom redirects.
It also manages to overcome the one problem that many other companies fail to provide and that is good support. Pandela uses a built-in ticketing system to make it easy for customers to voice out their problems. There is also a searchable knowledge base comprising answers to most often asked questions. Responses are usually replied in minutes. Monthly costs are also very competitive with basic plans costing only . The storage space of 5 GB may seem little, but the 256 MB RAM makes it far better than standard shared hosting packages. Other plans can be seen at the home page in Linux and Windows flavors. The Linux distro may also be chosen for any plan without worrying about contracts. The Windows Xen plans are unique and use Parallels Virtuozzo virtualization combined with powerful Quad-core Xeon servers.

Cons

Pandela began first as a free web hosting company and their services didn’t do so well compared to other free hosing providers. Now it looks as if they fixed these problems although some hosting companies have more storage space at the same price.
However, Pandela is still a recommendable hosting company with its great uptimes and a very many different VPS plans to choose from. Pandela will remain as a great server solution as long as they keep up the good work with the support and uptimes.

Pandela is also great for debian vps


Uncategorized e-mail account, hosting, panel, server, support, uptime

Sponsored Links

FatCow Web Hosting

Categories

  • Beauty Product (1)
  • Business (2)
  • Business Management (2)
  • Electronic Product (1)
  • Jobs Tips (2)
  • Leadership Training (1)
  • Life and Personal (1)
  • Make Money (2)
  • Sweeptakes (2)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Webmaster Tools (3)
  • Weight Loss (1)

Recent Posts

  • Best Choice of Your Home TV Needs
  • Incredible Collectible World Coins
  • How Many Resume Versions Are Too Many To Keep On Hand?
  • There Are Many Businesses Need A Storage Locker
  • Learn How To Find Internships In Hotels

Free Stuff

Archives

  • March 2017
  • November 2014
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • June 2008

Archives

  • March 2017
  • November 2014
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • June 2008

Archives

  • March 2017
  • November 2014
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • June 2008

Archives

  • March 2017
  • November 2014
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • June 2008

Powered by WordPress .Theme: Greenr by Webulous Themes